Possible Scenarios

Sample 1999 Men's College Basketball Tournament

as of Saturday, February 16, 2002 at 07:26 PM

Tourney Trackerô 2002 - by MicroFest
www.Tourney-Tracker.com
Scoring for Each Correct Pick per Round:
1st: 1.00
2nd: 2.00
3rd: 4.00
4th: 8.00
5th: 16.00
6th: 16.00

Tiebreaker: Points Final Game - Both Teams
Payout Percentages: 1st- 70%; 2nd- 20%; 3rd- 10%;
Cost per Entry: 5
Total Pot: 300


Game WinnersPool Winners
Champion: Connecticut; Runner-Up: Duke; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Ohio State 1st-Mike, C. ( 127.5 ), 2nd-Watson, L. #2 ( 120.5 ), 3rd-Harp, S. ( 118 ), 3rd-Prather, D. #2 ( 118 )
Champion: Connecticut; Runner-Up: Duke; Semis Losers: Kentucky, St. Johns 1st-Mike, C. ( 140.5 ), 2nd-Harp, S. ( 131 ), 3rd-Watson, L. #2 ( 120.5 )
Champion: Connecticut; Runner-Up: Duke; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Ohio State 1st-Springer, B. ( 128 ), 2nd-Daniel, A. ( 119 ), 2nd-Best, B. ( 119 )
Champion: Connecticut; Runner-Up: Duke; Semis Losers: Michigan St., St. Johns 1st-Prather, D. #1 ( 131 ), 2nd-Springer, B. ( 128 ), 3rd-Mike, C. ( 127.5 )
Champion: Connecticut; Runner-Up: Kentucky; Semis Losers: Duke, Ohio State 1st-Harp, S. ( 134 ), 2nd-Watson, L. #1 ( 118.5 ), 3rd-Mike, C. ( 111.5 )
Champion: Connecticut; Runner-Up: Kentucky; Semis Losers: Duke, St. Johns 1st-Harp, S. ( 147 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 124.5 ), 3rd-Watson, L. #1 ( 118.5 )
Champion: Connecticut; Runner-Up: Kentucky; Semis Losers: Temple, Ohio State 1st-Harp, S. ( 121 ), 2nd-Watson, L. #1 ( 105.5 ), 3rd-King, K. ( 99 )
Champion: Connecticut; Runner-Up: Kentucky; Semis Losers: Temple, St. Johns 1st-Harp, S. ( 134 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 111.5 ), 3rd-Watson, L. #1 ( 105.5 )
Champion: Connecticut; Runner-Up: Michigan St.; Semis Losers: Duke, Ohio State 1st-Daniel, A. ( 135 ), 2nd-Hahn, A. #1 ( 115 ), 3rd-Springer, B. ( 112 )
Champion: Connecticut; Runner-Up: Michigan St.; Semis Losers: Duke, St. Johns 1st-Daniel, A. ( 122 ), 2nd-Harp, S. ( 118 ), 3rd-Prather, D. #1 ( 115 ), 3rd-Hahn, A. #1 ( 115 )
Champion: Connecticut; Runner-Up: Michigan St.; Semis Losers: Temple, Ohio State 1st-Daniel, A. ( 122 ), 2nd-Hahn, A. #1 ( 102 ), 3rd-Springer, B. ( 99 )
Champion: Connecticut; Runner-Up: Michigan St.; Semis Losers: Temple, St. Johns 1st-Daniel, A. ( 109 ), 2nd-Harp, S. ( 105 ), 3rd-Prather, D. #1 ( 102 ), 3rd-Hahn, A. #1 ( 102 )
Champion: Connecticut; Runner-Up: Temple; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Ohio State 1st-Harp, S. ( 105 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 98.5 ), 3rd-Daniel, A. ( 93 )
Champion: Connecticut; Runner-Up: Temple; Semis Losers: Kentucky, St. Johns 1st-Harp, S. ( 118 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 111.5 ), 3rd-Watson, L. #2 ( 91.5 )
Champion: Connecticut; Runner-Up: Temple; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Ohio State 1st-Daniel, A. ( 106 ), 2nd-Springer, B. ( 99 ), 3rd-Harp, S. ( 97 )
Champion: Connecticut; Runner-Up: Temple; Semis Losers: Michigan St., St. Johns 1st-Harp, S. ( 105 ), 2nd-Prather, D. #1 ( 102 ), 3rd-Springer, B. ( 99 )
Champion: Duke; Runner-Up: Connecticut; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Ohio State 1st-Mike, C. ( 143.5 ), 2nd-Watson, L. #2 ( 136.5 ), 3rd-Prather, D. #2 ( 134 )
Champion: Duke; Runner-Up: Connecticut; Semis Losers: Kentucky, St. Johns 1st-Mike, C. ( 156.5 ), 2nd-Watson, L. #2 ( 136.5 ), 3rd-Crumpton, R. ( 135.5 )
Champion: Duke; Runner-Up: Connecticut; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Ohio State 1st-Best, B. ( 135 ), 2nd-Frayser, R. #2 ( 134.5 ), 3rd-Prather, D. #1 ( 134 )
Champion: Duke; Runner-Up: Connecticut; Semis Losers: Michigan St., St. Johns 1st-Prather, D. #1 ( 147 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 143.5 ), 3rd-Best, B. ( 135 )
Champion: Duke; Runner-Up: Gonzaga; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Ohio State 1st-Mike, C. ( 114.5 ), 2nd-Crumpton, R. ( 109.5 ), 3rd-Watson, L. #2 ( 107.5 )
Champion: Duke; Runner-Up: Gonzaga; Semis Losers: Kentucky, St. Johns 1st-Mike, C. ( 127.5 ), 2nd-Crumpton, R. ( 122.5 ), 3rd-Watson, L. #2 ( 107.5 )
Champion: Duke; Runner-Up: Gonzaga; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Ohio State 1st-Mike, C. ( 106.5 ), 2nd-Best, B. ( 106 ), 3rd-Frayser, R. #2 ( 105.5 )
Champion: Duke; Runner-Up: Gonzaga; Semis Losers: Michigan St., St. Johns 1st-Prather, D. #1 ( 118 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 114.5 ), 3rd-Crumpton, R. ( 109.5 )
Champion: Duke; Runner-Up: Ohio State; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Connecticut 1st-Mike, C. ( 127.5 ), 2nd-Crumpton, R. ( 122.5 ), 3rd-Watson, L. #2 ( 120.5 )
Champion: Duke; Runner-Up: Ohio State; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Gonzaga 1st-Mike, C. ( 114.5 ), 2nd-Crumpton, R. ( 109.5 ), 3rd-Watson, L. #2 ( 107.5 )
Champion: Duke; Runner-Up: Ohio State; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Connecticut 1st-Best, B. ( 119 ), 2nd-Frayser, R. #2 ( 118.5 ), 3rd-Prather, D. #1 ( 118 )
Champion: Duke; Runner-Up: Ohio State; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Gonzaga 1st-Mike, C. ( 106.5 ), 2nd-Best, B. ( 106 ), 3rd-Frayser, R. #2 ( 105.5 )
Champion: Duke; Runner-Up: St. Johns; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Connecticut 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 151.5 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 140.5 ), 3rd-Watson, L. #2 ( 120.5 )
Champion: Duke; Runner-Up: St. Johns; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Gonzaga 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 138.5 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 127.5 ), 3rd-Watson, L. #2 ( 107.5 )
Champion: Duke; Runner-Up: St. Johns; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Connecticut 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 138.5 ), 2nd-Prather, D. #1 ( 131 ), 3rd-Mike, C. ( 127.5 )
Champion: Duke; Runner-Up: St. Johns; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Gonzaga 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 125.5 ), 2nd-Prather, D. #1 ( 118 ), 3rd-Mike, C. ( 114.5 )
Champion: Gonzaga; Runner-Up: Duke; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Ohio State 1st-Mike, C. ( 98.5 ), 2nd-Crumpton, R. ( 93.5 ), 3rd-Watson, L. #2 ( 91.5 )
Champion: Gonzaga; Runner-Up: Duke; Semis Losers: Kentucky, St. Johns 1st-Mike, C. ( 111.5 ), 2nd-Crumpton, R. ( 106.5 ), 3rd-Watson, L. #2 ( 91.5 )
Champion: Gonzaga; Runner-Up: Duke; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Ohio State 1st-Mike, C. ( 90.5 ), 2nd-Best, B. ( 90 ), 2nd-Daniel, A. ( 90 )
Champion: Gonzaga; Runner-Up: Duke; Semis Losers: Michigan St., St. Johns 1st-Prather, D. #1 ( 102 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 98.5 ), 3rd-Crumpton, R. ( 93.5 )
Champion: Gonzaga; Runner-Up: Kentucky; Semis Losers: Duke, Ohio State 1st-Watson, L. #1 ( 89.5 ), 2nd-Harp, S. ( 89 ), 3rd-Estill, S. ( 88 )
Champion: Gonzaga; Runner-Up: Kentucky; Semis Losers: Duke, St. Johns 1st-Harp, S. ( 102 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 95.5 ), 3rd-Crumpton, R. ( 90.5 )
Champion: Gonzaga; Runner-Up: Kentucky; Semis Losers: Temple, Ohio State 1st-Watson, L. #1 ( 81.5 ), 2nd-Harp, S. ( 81 ), 3rd-Estill, S. ( 80 )
Champion: Gonzaga; Runner-Up: Kentucky; Semis Losers: Temple, St. Johns 1st-Harp, S. ( 89 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 82.5 ), 3rd-Watson, L. #1 ( 81.5 )
Champion: Gonzaga; Runner-Up: Michigan St.; Semis Losers: Duke, Ohio State 1st-Daniel, A. ( 106 ), 2nd-Pyles, J. ( 102 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 94.5 )
Champion: Gonzaga; Runner-Up: Michigan St.; Semis Losers: Duke, St. Johns 1st-Gawarecki, E. ( 94.5 ), 2nd-Daniel, A. ( 93 ), 3rd-Pyles, J. ( 89 )
Champion: Gonzaga; Runner-Up: Michigan St.; Semis Losers: Temple, Ohio State 1st-Daniel, A. ( 93 ), 2nd-Pyles, J. ( 89 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 86.5 )
Champion: Gonzaga; Runner-Up: Michigan St.; Semis Losers: Temple, St. Johns 1st-Gawarecki, E. ( 86.5 ), 2nd-Daniel, A. ( 85 ), 3rd-Pyles, J. ( 81 )
Champion: Gonzaga; Runner-Up: Temple; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Ohio State 1st-Mike, C. ( 74.5 ), 2nd-Greenwell, K. ( 70 ), 3rd-Crumpton, R. ( 69.5 )
Champion: Gonzaga; Runner-Up: Temple; Semis Losers: Kentucky, St. Johns 1st-Mike, C. ( 82.5 ), 2nd-Greenwell, K. ( 78 ), 3rd-Crumpton, R. ( 77.5 )
Champion: Gonzaga; Runner-Up: Temple; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Ohio State 1st-Daniel, A. ( 77 ), 2nd-Pyles, J. ( 73 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 70.5 )
Champion: Gonzaga; Runner-Up: Temple; Semis Losers: Michigan St., St. Johns 1st-Mike, C. ( 74.5 ), 2nd-Prather, D. #1 ( 73 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 70.5 )
Champion: Kentucky; Runner-Up: Connecticut; Semis Losers: Duke, Ohio State 1st-Watson, L. #1 ( 134.5 ), 2nd-Scrivener, D. ( 126 ), 3rd-Harp, S. ( 118 ), 3rd-Thomas, N. ( 118 )
Champion: Kentucky; Runner-Up: Connecticut; Semis Losers: Duke, St. Johns 1st-Watson, L. #1 ( 134.5 ), 2nd-Harp, S. ( 131 ), 3rd-Scrivener, D. ( 126 )
Champion: Kentucky; Runner-Up: Connecticut; Semis Losers: Temple, Ohio State 1st-Watson, L. #1 ( 121.5 ), 2nd-King, K. ( 115 ), 3rd-Scrivener, D. ( 113 )
Champion: Kentucky; Runner-Up: Connecticut; Semis Losers: Temple, St. Johns 1st-Watson, L. #1 ( 121.5 ), 2nd-Harp, S. ( 118 ), 3rd-King, K. ( 115 )
Champion: Kentucky; Runner-Up: Gonzaga; Semis Losers: Duke, Ohio State 1st-Watson, L. #1 ( 105.5 ), 2nd-Estill, S. ( 104 ), 3rd-Scrivener, D. ( 97 )
Champion: Kentucky; Runner-Up: Gonzaga; Semis Losers: Duke, St. Johns 1st-Watson, L. #1 ( 105.5 ), 2nd-Estill, S. ( 104 ), 3rd-Harp, S. ( 102 )
Champion: Kentucky; Runner-Up: Gonzaga; Semis Losers: Temple, Ohio State 1st-Watson, L. #1 ( 97.5 ), 2nd-Estill, S. ( 96 ), 3rd-King, K. ( 91 )
Champion: Kentucky; Runner-Up: Gonzaga; Semis Losers: Temple, St. Johns 1st-Watson, L. #1 ( 97.5 ), 2nd-Estill, S. ( 96 ), 3rd-King, K. ( 91 )
Champion: Kentucky; Runner-Up: Ohio State; Semis Losers: Duke, Connecticut 1st-Watson, L. #1 ( 118.5 ), 2nd-Estill, S. ( 117 ), 3rd-Scrivener, D. ( 110 )
Champion: Kentucky; Runner-Up: Ohio State; Semis Losers: Duke, Gonzaga 1st-Watson, L. #1 ( 105.5 ), 2nd-Estill, S. ( 104 ), 3rd-Scrivener, D. ( 97 )
Champion: Kentucky; Runner-Up: Ohio State; Semis Losers: Temple, Connecticut 1st-Watson, L. #1 ( 105.5 ), 2nd-Estill, S. ( 104 ), 3rd-King, K. ( 99 )
Champion: Kentucky; Runner-Up: Ohio State; Semis Losers: Temple, Gonzaga 1st-Watson, L. #1 ( 97.5 ), 2nd-Estill, S. ( 96 ), 3rd-King, K. ( 91 )
Champion: Kentucky; Runner-Up: St. Johns; Semis Losers: Duke, Connecticut 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 119.5 ), 2nd-Watson, L. #1 ( 118.5 ), 3rd-Estill, S. ( 117 )
Champion: Kentucky; Runner-Up: St. Johns; Semis Losers: Duke, Gonzaga 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 106.5 ), 2nd-Watson, L. #1 ( 105.5 ), 3rd-Estill, S. ( 104 )
Champion: Kentucky; Runner-Up: St. Johns; Semis Losers: Temple, Connecticut 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 106.5 ), 2nd-Watson, L. #1 ( 105.5 ), 3rd-Estill, S. ( 104 )
Champion: Kentucky; Runner-Up: St. Johns; Semis Losers: Temple, Gonzaga 1st-Watson, L. #1 ( 97.5 ), 2nd-Estill, S. ( 96 ), 3rd-Crumpton, R. ( 93.5 )
Champion: Michigan St.; Runner-Up: Connecticut; Semis Losers: Duke, Ohio State 1st-Daniel, A. ( 151 ), 2nd-Hahn, A. #1 ( 131 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 123.5 )
Champion: Michigan St.; Runner-Up: Connecticut; Semis Losers: Duke, St. Johns 1st-Daniel, A. ( 138 ), 2nd-Hahn, A. #1 ( 131 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 123.5 )
Champion: Michigan St.; Runner-Up: Connecticut; Semis Losers: Temple, Ohio State 1st-Daniel, A. ( 138 ), 2nd-Hahn, A. #1 ( 118 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 110.5 )
Champion: Michigan St.; Runner-Up: Connecticut; Semis Losers: Temple, St. Johns 1st-Daniel, A. ( 125 ), 2nd-Hahn, A. #1 ( 118 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 110.5 )
Champion: Michigan St.; Runner-Up: Gonzaga; Semis Losers: Duke, Ohio State 1st-Daniel, A. ( 122 ), 2nd-Pyles, J. ( 118 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 110.5 )
Champion: Michigan St.; Runner-Up: Gonzaga; Semis Losers: Duke, St. Johns 1st-Gawarecki, E. ( 110.5 ), 2nd-Daniel, A. ( 109 ), 3rd-Pyles, J. ( 105 )
Champion: Michigan St.; Runner-Up: Gonzaga; Semis Losers: Temple, Ohio State 1st-Daniel, A. ( 109 ), 2nd-Pyles, J. ( 105 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 102.5 )
Champion: Michigan St.; Runner-Up: Gonzaga; Semis Losers: Temple, St. Johns 1st-Gawarecki, E. ( 102.5 ), 2nd-Daniel, A. ( 101 ), 3rd-Pyles, J. ( 97 )
Champion: Michigan St.; Runner-Up: Ohio State; Semis Losers: Duke, Connecticut 1st-Daniel, A. ( 135 ), 2nd-Pyles, J. ( 134 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 123.5 )
Champion: Michigan St.; Runner-Up: Ohio State; Semis Losers: Duke, Gonzaga 1st-Pyles, J. ( 134 ), 2nd-Daniel, A. ( 122 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 110.5 )
Champion: Michigan St.; Runner-Up: Ohio State; Semis Losers: Temple, Connecticut 1st-Daniel, A. ( 122 ), 2nd-Pyles, J. ( 121 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 110.5 )
Champion: Michigan St.; Runner-Up: Ohio State; Semis Losers: Temple, Gonzaga 1st-Pyles, J. ( 121 ), 2nd-Daniel, A. ( 109 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 102.5 )
Champion: Michigan St.; Runner-Up: St. Johns; Semis Losers: Duke, Connecticut 1st-Gawarecki, E. ( 123.5 ), 2nd-Daniel, A. ( 122 ), 3rd-Hahn, A. #1 ( 115 )
Champion: Michigan St.; Runner-Up: St. Johns; Semis Losers: Duke, Gonzaga 1st-Gawarecki, E. ( 110.5 ), 2nd-Daniel, A. ( 109 ), 3rd-Pyles, J. ( 105 )
Champion: Michigan St.; Runner-Up: St. Johns; Semis Losers: Temple, Connecticut 1st-Gawarecki, E. ( 110.5 ), 2nd-Daniel, A. ( 109 ), 3rd-Hahn, A. #1 ( 102 )
Champion: Michigan St.; Runner-Up: St. Johns; Semis Losers: Temple, Gonzaga 1st-Gawarecki, E. ( 102.5 ), 2nd-Daniel, A. ( 101 ), 3rd-Pyles, J. ( 97 )
Champion: Ohio State; Runner-Up: Duke; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Connecticut 1st-Mike, C. ( 111.5 ), 2nd-Crumpton, R. ( 106.5 ), 3rd-Watson, L. #2 ( 104.5 )
Champion: Ohio State; Runner-Up: Duke; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Gonzaga 1st-Mike, C. ( 98.5 ), 2nd-Crumpton, R. ( 93.5 ), 3rd-Watson, L. #2 ( 91.5 )
Champion: Ohio State; Runner-Up: Duke; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Connecticut 1st-Best, B. ( 103 ), 1st-Daniel, A. ( 103 ), 3rd-Frayser, R. #2 ( 102.5 )
Champion: Ohio State; Runner-Up: Duke; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Gonzaga 1st-Pyles, J. ( 102 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 90.5 ), 3rd-Best, B. ( 90 ), 3rd-Daniel, A. ( 90 )
Champion: Ohio State; Runner-Up: Kentucky; Semis Losers: Duke, Connecticut 1st-Watson, L. #1 ( 102.5 ), 2nd-Harp, S. ( 102 ), 3rd-Estill, S. ( 101 )
Champion: Ohio State; Runner-Up: Kentucky; Semis Losers: Duke, Gonzaga 1st-Watson, L. #1 ( 89.5 ), 2nd-Harp, S. ( 89 ), 2nd-Pyles, J. ( 89 )
Champion: Ohio State; Runner-Up: Kentucky; Semis Losers: Temple, Connecticut 1st-Watson, L. #1 ( 89.5 ), 2nd-Harp, S. ( 89 ), 3rd-Estill, S. ( 88 )
Champion: Ohio State; Runner-Up: Kentucky; Semis Losers: Temple, Gonzaga 1st-Watson, L. #1 ( 81.5 ), 2nd-Harp, S. ( 81 ), 2nd-Pyles, J. ( 81 )
Champion: Ohio State; Runner-Up: Michigan St.; Semis Losers: Duke, Connecticut 1st-Daniel, A. ( 119 ), 2nd-Pyles, J. ( 118 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 107.5 )
Champion: Ohio State; Runner-Up: Michigan St.; Semis Losers: Duke, Gonzaga 1st-Pyles, J. ( 118 ), 2nd-Daniel, A. ( 106 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 94.5 )
Champion: Ohio State; Runner-Up: Michigan St.; Semis Losers: Temple, Connecticut 1st-Daniel, A. ( 106 ), 2nd-Pyles, J. ( 105 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 94.5 )
Champion: Ohio State; Runner-Up: Michigan St.; Semis Losers: Temple, Gonzaga 1st-Pyles, J. ( 105 ), 2nd-Daniel, A. ( 93 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 86.5 )
Champion: Ohio State; Runner-Up: Temple; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Connecticut 1st-Mike, C. ( 82.5 ), 2nd-Pyles, J. ( 81 ), 3rd-Crumpton, R. ( 77.5 )
Champion: Ohio State; Runner-Up: Temple; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Gonzaga 1st-Pyles, J. ( 81 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 74.5 ), 3rd-Greenwell, K. ( 70 )
Champion: Ohio State; Runner-Up: Temple; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Connecticut 1st-Daniel, A. ( 90 ), 2nd-Pyles, J. ( 89 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 78.5 )
Champion: Ohio State; Runner-Up: Temple; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Gonzaga 1st-Pyles, J. ( 89 ), 2nd-Daniel, A. ( 77 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 70.5 )
Champion: St. Johns; Runner-Up: Duke; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Connecticut 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 135.5 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 124.5 ), 3rd-Watson, L. #2 ( 104.5 )
Champion: St. Johns; Runner-Up: Duke; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Gonzaga 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 122.5 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 111.5 ), 3rd-Watson, L. #2 ( 91.5 )
Champion: St. Johns; Runner-Up: Duke; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Connecticut 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 122.5 ), 2nd-Prather, D. #1 ( 115 ), 3rd-Mike, C. ( 111.5 )
Champion: St. Johns; Runner-Up: Duke; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Gonzaga 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 109.5 ), 2nd-Prather, D. #1 ( 102 ), 3rd-Mike, C. ( 98.5 )
Champion: St. Johns; Runner-Up: Kentucky; Semis Losers: Duke, Connecticut 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 119.5 ), 2nd-Harp, S. ( 115 ), 3rd-Mike, C. ( 108.5 )
Champion: St. Johns; Runner-Up: Kentucky; Semis Losers: Duke, Gonzaga 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 106.5 ), 2nd-Harp, S. ( 102 ), 3rd-Mike, C. ( 95.5 )
Champion: St. Johns; Runner-Up: Kentucky; Semis Losers: Temple, Connecticut 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 106.5 ), 2nd-Harp, S. ( 102 ), 3rd-Mike, C. ( 95.5 )
Champion: St. Johns; Runner-Up: Kentucky; Semis Losers: Temple, Gonzaga 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 93.5 ), 2nd-Harp, S. ( 89 ), 3rd-Mike, C. ( 82.5 )
Champion: St. Johns; Runner-Up: Michigan St.; Semis Losers: Duke, Connecticut 1st-Gawarecki, E. ( 107.5 ), 2nd-Crumpton, R. ( 106.5 ), 3rd-Daniel, A. ( 106 )
Champion: St. Johns; Runner-Up: Michigan St.; Semis Losers: Duke, Gonzaga 1st-Gawarecki, E. ( 94.5 ), 2nd-Crumpton, R. ( 93.5 ), 3rd-Daniel, A. ( 93 )
Champion: St. Johns; Runner-Up: Michigan St.; Semis Losers: Temple, Connecticut 1st-Gawarecki, E. ( 94.5 ), 2nd-Crumpton, R. ( 93.5 ), 3rd-Daniel, A. ( 93 )
Champion: St. Johns; Runner-Up: Michigan St.; Semis Losers: Temple, Gonzaga 1st-Gawarecki, E. ( 86.5 ), 2nd-Crumpton, R. ( 85.5 ), 3rd-Daniel, A. ( 85 )
Champion: St. Johns; Runner-Up: Temple; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Connecticut 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 106.5 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 95.5 ), 3rd-Harp, S. ( 86 )
Champion: St. Johns; Runner-Up: Temple; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Gonzaga 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 93.5 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 82.5 ), 3rd-Greenwell, K. ( 78 )
Champion: St. Johns; Runner-Up: Temple; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Connecticut 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 93.5 ), 2nd-Prather, D. #1 ( 86 ), 3rd-Mike, C. ( 82.5 )
Champion: St. Johns; Runner-Up: Temple; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Gonzaga 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 85.5 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 74.5 ), 3rd-Prather, D. #1 ( 73 )
Champion: Temple; Runner-Up: Connecticut; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Ohio State 1st-Mike, C. ( 98.5 ), 2nd-Daniel, A. ( 93 ), 3rd-Watson, L. #2 ( 91.5 )
Champion: Temple; Runner-Up: Connecticut; Semis Losers: Kentucky, St. Johns 1st-Mike, C. ( 111.5 ), 2nd-Harp, S. ( 102 ), 3rd-Watson, L. #2 ( 91.5 )
Champion: Temple; Runner-Up: Connecticut; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Ohio State 1st-Daniel, A. ( 106 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 90.5 ), 3rd-Best, B. ( 90 )
Champion: Temple; Runner-Up: Connecticut; Semis Losers: Michigan St., St. Johns 1st-Prather, D. #1 ( 102 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 98.5 ), 3rd-Daniel, A. ( 93 )
Champion: Temple; Runner-Up: Gonzaga; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Ohio State 1st-Mike, C. ( 74.5 ), 2nd-Greenwell, K. ( 70 ), 3rd-Crumpton, R. ( 69.5 )
Champion: Temple; Runner-Up: Gonzaga; Semis Losers: Kentucky, St. Johns 1st-Mike, C. ( 82.5 ), 2nd-Greenwell, K. ( 78 ), 3rd-Crumpton, R. ( 77.5 )
Champion: Temple; Runner-Up: Gonzaga; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Ohio State 1st-Daniel, A. ( 77 ), 2nd-Pyles, J. ( 73 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 70.5 )
Champion: Temple; Runner-Up: Gonzaga; Semis Losers: Michigan St., St. Johns 1st-Mike, C. ( 74.5 ), 2nd-Prather, D. #1 ( 73 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 70.5 )
Champion: Temple; Runner-Up: Ohio State; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Connecticut 1st-Mike, C. ( 82.5 ), 2nd-Pyles, J. ( 81 ), 3rd-Crumpton, R. ( 77.5 )
Champion: Temple; Runner-Up: Ohio State; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Gonzaga 1st-Pyles, J. ( 81 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 74.5 ), 3rd-Greenwell, K. ( 70 )
Champion: Temple; Runner-Up: Ohio State; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Connecticut 1st-Daniel, A. ( 90 ), 2nd-Pyles, J. ( 89 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 78.5 )
Champion: Temple; Runner-Up: Ohio State; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Gonzaga 1st-Pyles, J. ( 89 ), 2nd-Daniel, A. ( 77 ), 3rd-Gawarecki, E. ( 70.5 )
Champion: Temple; Runner-Up: St. Johns; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Connecticut 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 106.5 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 95.5 ), 3rd-Harp, S. ( 86 )
Champion: Temple; Runner-Up: St. Johns; Semis Losers: Kentucky, Gonzaga 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 93.5 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 82.5 ), 3rd-Greenwell, K. ( 78 )
Champion: Temple; Runner-Up: St. Johns; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Connecticut 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 93.5 ), 2nd-Prather, D. #1 ( 86 ), 3rd-Mike, C. ( 82.5 )
Champion: Temple; Runner-Up: St. Johns; Semis Losers: Michigan St., Gonzaga 1st-Crumpton, R. ( 85.5 ), 2nd-Mike, C. ( 74.5 ), 3rd-Prather, D. #1 ( 73 )